National Opt Out Day

Today is national Opt Out Day. Today is the day that United Opt Out, a group of grassroots public education advocates from across the country, has called on parents, students, teachers, administrators, school board members, and anyone else who cares about what is happening to our schools to challenge corporate style education “reform” in our own communities. It’s time to think about what opting out means.

For just over a year, this grassroots movement here in Southwest Pennsylvania has been standing up for public education: fighting for adequate resources, equity, and policies that support public schools as a public good. Dr. Mark Naison, professor of African American studies and History at Fordham University and a public education activist, compares what is happening now to the rights movements of the 1960s, which grew in the context of the great Civil Rights Movement. Our current work for public education “began with conversations, most of them private; then meetings; then formation of organizations; then rallies, marches, boycotts, lawsuits and strikes – the same model followed by movements of the Sixties on behalf of women’s and gay rights.” [LA Progressive, 12-3-12]

Our movement is still relatively young, both at the local level with groups such as ours and at the national level with new organizations such as Parents Across America, Save Our Schools, and United Opt Out that have emerged in just the past couple years. But Dr. Naison notes that we have already “robbed [corporate style reform] of its air of romance, exposed its links to big money interests, and challenged its claim to promote the cause of equity and civil rights.” Perhaps most importantly, our movement has “let individual teachers, parents and students who were feeling smothered and abused by the new policies know that they are not alone and that resistance is possible.” Naison identifies four steps in this moral and political awakening: “The first step is telling the truth about what Reform is really doing to our schools; the second step is to share that insight with colleagues, friends and family; the third step is to attend rallies and public meetings which challenge the Reform agenda; and the fourth step is to Opt-Out, Boycott, Strike and Sue.” [LA Progressive, 12-3-12]

According to Dr. Naison, most folks are in stage one or two – talking about what is happening in our schools and sharing that information with our networks. Here in Yinzer Nation, most of us leapt into stage three – attending rallies and publicly challenging threats to our schools such as the massive budget cuts. (If you need a reminder of all the incredible work we accomplished in 2012, please see “Top 10 Success List.”) Now it’s time to move to that fourth step and consider what an Opt Out movement could do here for our schools.

Let me start by sharing the conclusion I’ve come to: this year, my children will not be taking any high-stakes-tests. That means no PSSAs, no Keystone Exams; none of the approximately 23 standardized tests my sixth grader would be subjected to (nine more than last year). These tests are damaging our schools, our teachers, and most significantly, our children’s education. We’ve rallied in snowstorms, met with our legislators, written letters to the editor, held vigils for our furloughed teachers … heck, I’ve been all the way to the White House – twice – talking about what is happening to public education. This is fundamentally a civil rights issue about equal access to a great education for all our children, and now is the time for civil disobedience: my family can no longer participate in a system that is causing great harm to the people and institutions I care about.

Dr. Tim Slekar, who last week helped us understand how high-stakes-tests are being misused to harm our teachers, explains: “all of this testing, test prep homework, data driven instruction and holding teachers accountable has sent an entire generation of students to careers and college less prepared to do real intellectual work and lacking any sense of imagination and curiosity. This system is destroying our children.” He is one of the founding members of United Opt Out, lives here in Pennsylvania, and has opted his own son out of high-stakes-testing. He believes opting out is “the only thing we have that has a chance at stopping this insanity” and that this “decision is pro child, pro teacher and pro public school.” He reminds us that, “Taking care of our children is our first responsibility. … We are talking about stopping the intellectual abuse and demeaning educational experiences our children have had to sit through for 10 years.” [@theChalkFace, 12-21-12]

In the coming days, we will look at the connection between high-stakes-testing and budget cuts. We will examine how these tests have changed school culture and how teachers feel about having to administer them. We will review the plague of cheating scandals that have infested our state, all the way to the PA Secretary of Education himself. And we will recall the misuses of our children’s test data, now being inappropriately and punitively applied to teacher evaluation and school closure.

Today I am saying: this is our data and they cannot have it. I care about learning, not testing. That doesn’t mean I am against all testing – of course our teachers need to assess student learning. But testing is not learning. Enough is enough with the high-stakes-testing. In Pennsylvania it is our right as parents to review copies of these tests that will be administered to our children and then to request a religious exemption (I will explain more about this soon, too). Therefore, I will be calling upon the traditions of social justice, social action, equity, and compassion at the root of all our major religions to quite simply opt my children out of this madness. For them, for their school, their teachers, and for the institution of public education.

Today is national Opt Out Day. What will you do?

 

Help grow our grassroots movement for public education: join other volunteer parents, students, educators, and concerned community members by subscribing to Yinzercation. Enter your email address and hit the “Sign me up” button to get these pieces delivered directly to your inbox and encourage your networks to do the same. Really. Can you get five of your friends to subscribe? Working together we can win this fight for our schools.

10 thoughts on “National Opt Out Day

  1. In October I informed my Principal of my intention to Opt Out of 4th grade high-stakes tests and asked to see the exams (first step).

    I was told that I will have to send my request again, closer to the date of the PSSAs, to the PPS Office of Research, Assessment and Accountability, since they are not available to review.

    So, today, in the spirit of National Opt Out Day, I will share the contact information for Dr. Paulette Poncelet, Chief of Research, Assessment and Accountability, Pittsburgh Public Schools.

    pponcelet1@pghboe.net
    622-3741

    All requests for Opting Out should be addressed to Dr. Poncelet and your Principal.

    • Pam, thank you for sharing this information. My understanding is that every school is required to have an assessment coordinator. By law, we are allowed to request a meeting with that person after the tests arrive from the state — sometime in February. At that meeting, we can review the test if we wish, and then submit a letter requesting a religious exemption from the testing. Sample letters are available on the United Opt Out web site and we will share more in the coming weeks.

  2. Pingback: National Opt Out Day « slekar

  3. It is scary for me to contemplate, but I am willing to have my kids opt out of these tests. It reminds me of the civil disobedience of the civil rights era. I believe we must take meaningful action that will arrest the attention of the decision makers!

    • I agree this is scary to consider at first. But the alternative seems far worse to me — to continue to participate in a system that is abusing our children and damaging our schools. We must do more than get the attention of our legislators, we have to make decisions that protect our kids, our teachers, and our schools. For me, it has become very much a moral and ethical decision — and far from being “radical,” it feels very comfortable, a very sane and rational decision based on the evidence.

    • This action is scary but I don’t know of an alternative. My sister-in-law, with kids in the Carmel, Indiana school district, received a letter requesting parents to send sick kids to school as a solution to avoid a poor ‘attendance grade’ for the school. No worries- the sick child can immediately go to the school nurse and be sent right back home! Clearly, these education reform policies are not for the benefit of the kids. This has to stop, right?

  4. I’m reluctant to do this is because a good PSSA is my child’s ticket to advanced classes, since he did not test as gifted. His 5th grade score was one of the qualifying factors for him to be in 6th grade advanced math this year.

  5. My kids aren’t in public schools partly because of just this. But programs like CMites, for example, hand out admission based on these tests and give financial aid based on whether or not your kid gets free lunch at public school. It’s important to understand how these public school criteria overflow the schools themselves into extra-curricular and recreational areas, too.

  6. Although I am against this kind of high stakes testing, I am really torn about what to do. You see, when students do not take the tests, it negatively effects the chances of their school making AYP. And while I wish things were not the way they are, if our school fails to make AYP this year (while in “Corrective Action II) we have simply been told the ominous: “bad things will happen”. I guess you can see the dilemma I face as a teacher at the school my daughter attends.

Leave a Reply (posting policy: no name calling, keep it civil or we'll send in the Kindergarten teachers for a lesson in manners)