Corbett Blames … Us

It’s time to do a little unpacking of Governor Corbett’s budget speech, which he delivered last week along with the news that he would be cutting almost another $100 MILLION more from our schools.

In his address, Gov. Corbett accused groups like ours — volunteer parents, students, teachers, and community members — of purposefully deceiving the public about the budget cuts. He stated, “There has been some confusion, even deception, about what we did and did not do with the Basic Education formula last year. Some keep insisting we cut Basic Ed.”

As we explained in “Dishonesty Disguised as Generosity,” Gov. Corbett is always very careful to state that he did not cut the Basic Education Funding (BEF) line item. Here’s how he said it last Tuesday: “We leave the Basic Education Funding formula at its current level. There are no cuts. In fact, you will find a slight increase. Just as we did last year.” What he actually did was cut many other line items and roll others into the BEF, so that the Basic Education Funding line went up slightly, but overall, education funding has been slashed. (And that slight increase was to cover mandated state-pension payments.) Now who’s trying to practice confusion and deception?

What’s worse, Governor Corbett then claimed, “This urban legend was spread by those who have the most to gain from additional funding at taxpayer expense.” Excuse me? Those who stand to gain the most from additional funding would be our children — you know, the students of Pennsylvania who lost $1 BILLION in funding last year. (And yes, restored funding would be at “taxpayer expense” — that’s how we pay for schools in our United States democracy. It’s one of the most important uses of our tax system.)

Sadly, this is no urban legend. In fact, some of the school districts that are being hit the hardest by these state cuts are outside the urban core. In Allegheny County, it’s places like Baldwin Whitehall, East Allegheny, Elizabeth Forward, Highlands, McKeesport, Penn Hills, Plum Borough, Shaler Area, South Allegheny, Sto-Rox, Steel Valley, West Mifflin, Wilkinsburg, and Woodland Hills school districts that all lost over $1 MILLION in combined cuts since that first devastating budget in 2010-2011.

Or Armstrong and Apollo Ridge school districts up in Armstrong  County. Or Butler Area, Karns City, Moniteau, Slippery Rock, South Butler County, and Seneca Valley school districts in Butler County. Or Aliquippa, Ambridge, Big Beaver Falls, Hopewell, and New Brighton in Beaver County. Or Burgettstown, Canon-McMillan, Charleroi, McGuffey, Ringgold, Trinity, and Washington school districts in Washington County. Or Belle Vernon, Derry Area, Greensburg Salem, Hempfield, Jeannette City, Kiski Area, Mount Pleasant, New Kensington-Arnold, Norwin, Penn-Trafford, Southmoreland, Yough, and Greater Latrobe in Westmoreland County. The list goes on and on in Fayette and Greene Counties and the rest of Yinzer Nation. (See this list for your school district’s actual numbers.)

And these are only the school districts that lost over a million — plenty of school districts have lost nearly that much. So it’s a little hard to swallow when Governor Corbett says, “In fact … last year’s budget was the largest amount the state’s taxpayers have ever put into the Basic Education funding formula. The largest until this year.”

The Governor claims that the state helped to replace federal stimulus money, which schools should have known was a short-term fix. (We responded to this fallacious claim in “Should Schools Have Known the $$ was Temporary?”) It boils down to this: the previous administration under Governor Rendell did schools no favors when it committed to increasing funding for public education (a good thing) to address extremely serious equity issues (a very good thing), but without a long term budget plan. When the federal stimulus dollars became available, they were used to fill an existing state budget hole — a hole that the state had already committed itself to filling, and a commitment that Governor Corbett is now refusing to fulfill.

The governor closed his remarks on education in the budget address by declaring, “I want the various special interests out there to understand this: If we are going to debate education funding, let’s use real numbers.” Yes, let’s. But who are these “special interest” groups he seems to be so angry with? Students and their families do not have huge Political Action Committees and paid lobbyists. Is it teachers? School boards? Really?

The parents, teachers, and concerned community members I’ve met through this grassroots movement here in Southwestern PA have a special interest in students and our schools. It’s time legislators take the same special interest in adequately funding public education and our children’s future.

One thought on “Corbett Blames … Us

  1. Another thing we need to address with respect to public education is the voucher bill that is looming over our heads and the amount of money our districts pay to cyber and charter schools. I haven’t yet seen this addressed, so I’m going to start the conversation rolling. Public education is a right mandated by our Commonwealth’s Constitution. Pennsylvania pays less towards public education than the majority of the states. Under the voucher bill school districts will be required to pay $5,000 per student to private, parochial and charter schools for each student in said district that attends one of these alternative schools. Hence, public funds are going to be supporting private purposes. The charter, parochial and private school WILL NOT be required to maintain the same standard of education that our public schools are, yet our public monies will fund them. The reason public school districts are required to administer standardized testing and mainatain a level of improvement is becuase they are funded by public money, but the other schools will not be held to this same accountability. Further, in my district alone, approximately $600,000 was spent last year for children attending cyber schools. Districts pay 95% of their per student spending to cyber schools. For example, if it costs your district $10,000 per year to educate a child, the district must pay a cyber school about $9,000 per year since that child attends cyber school; cyber schools are not brick and mortar, it does not cost them that much to educate a child. In addition, of the 11 cyber schools in our area, I believe only 2 tested proficient on standardized tests last year. PA Cyber built a beautiful arts center that provides gymnastics, dance, acting and music to their students beginning at a preschool level. It was described to me by a parent who has a child who attends PA Cyber as a “glorified babysitting program with extracurricular classes that most people have to pay for out of their own pockets, but is free [to PA Cyber] students.

    Nobody is fighting these two gross manipulations of public funds, and I think these situations need to be brought to the table, as well. Please let me know if you’d like to discuss further.

Leave a Reply (posting policy: no name calling, keep it civil or we'll send in the Kindergarten teachers for a lesson in manners)

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s